No. 21-6362
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: booker booker-standard district-court-discretion due-process family-circumstances probabilistic-model procedural-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness u.s.s.g.-§5h1.6
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Procedural-and-substantive-reasonableness-of-sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question I. — Was Rocky Krupa’s sentence procedurally and substantively unreasonable as the district court did not consider nor articulate why the appellant could not receive a lesser sentence due to family circumstances as permitted by Booker and U.S.S.G. §5H1.6, and simply applied the probabilistic model of the Sentencing Guidelines in an unjust way. 2 LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Rocky Krupa
Michael Martin Losavio — University of Louisville, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent