No. 21-6362

Rocky Krupa v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: booker booker-standard district-court-discretion due-process family-circumstances probabilistic-model procedural-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness u.s.s.g.-§5h1.6
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Procedural-and-substantive-reasonableness-of-sentence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question I. — Was Rocky Krupa’s sentence procedurally and substantively unreasonable as the district court did not consider nor articulate why the appellant could not receive a lesser sentence due to family circumstances as permitted by Booker and U.S.S.G. §5H1.6, and simply applied the probabilistic model of the Sentencing Guidelines in an unjust way. 2 LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Rocky Krupa
Michael Martin LosavioUniversity of Louisville, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent