No. 21-6372
James Michael Bartley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights competency-proceeding constitutional-challenge due-process gun-rights judicial-review mental-competency mental-illness right-to-bear-arms second-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government may deny a law-abiding citizen their right to bear arms under the Second Amendment based solely on a competency proceeding that entailed no finding of mental illness or dangerousness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether the government may deny a law-abiding citizen their right to bear arms under the Second Amendment based solely on a competency proceeding that entailed no finding of mental illness or dangerousness.
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2021)
Attorneys
James Bartley
Theodore Blank — Federal Defender Services of Idaho, Petitioner
Theodore Blank — Federal Defender Services of Idaho, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent