No. 21-6390

Marcial Carrillo-Serna v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court-error guidelines-calculation molina-martinez-v-united-states ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-review plain-error plain-error-review prejudice sentencing-guidelines substantial-rights
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When the district court fails to calculate the guideline range at sentencing, whether the defendant may rely on the district court's error alone to show prejudice under plain error review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW When the district court fails to calculate the guideline range at sentencing, whether the defendant may rely on the district court’s error alone to show prejudice under plain error review when the “record is silent as to what the district court might have done had it considered the correct Guidelines range,” Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338, 1347 (2016). prefix

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Marcial Carrillo-Serna
Zandra LopezFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent