No. 21-6392

Janet Berry v. William Paul Nichols, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 4th-amendment bivens-claim civil-rights digital-privacy fourth-amendment medical-records search-and-seizure standing state-actors warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA FourthAmendment HealthPrivacy Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Related Cases: 21-6309 (Vide) 21-6535 (Vide) 21-6545 (Vide) 21-841 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where a BERT is created by the government accompanied with private entities acting as state actors under the color of law, via an invalid warrantless search and seizure of a patient's possessory interest in their digital medical records and personal identifier, in a state other than the state described in particularity in the search warrant, and where a legitimate expectation of privacy existed, and the peril caused a constitutional 4th amendment and a physical injury, does the petitioner have standing for a cause of action for a 42 U.S.C § 1983 remedy under Monell and/or a Bivens Claim?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED |. Where a bert is created, by the government accompanied with private entities acting as state actors under the color of law , via an invalid warrantless search and seizure of a patient’s . Possessory interest in their digital medical records and personal identifier, in a state other than the state described in particularity in the search warrant, and where a legitimate expectation of privacy existed, and the peril caused a constitutional 4 amendment and a physical in injury, does that petitioner has standing for a cause of action for a 42 U.S.C § 1983 remedy undera Moneil and /or a Bivens Claim ? ii

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-07
Waiver of right of respondents Monroe County Respondents to respond filed.
2022-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-22
Waiver of right of respondents State of Michigan; Bill Schuette; Dana Nessel; MI Bureau of Licensing and Regulations, et al. to respond filed.
2021-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-08
Waiver of right of respondents City of Monroe, Monroe Police Department, Police Chief Charles McCormick, Sergeant Chris Miller, Sergeant Derek Lindsay, Corporal Donald Brady, Detective Brent Cathey, Officer Shawn Koch, Officer Aaron Oetjens, Officer Mike Merkle to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Ray Kisonas to respond filed.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondents Blue Cross Blue Shield, et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Blue Cross Respondents
Phillip J. DeRosierDickinson Wright PLLC, Respondent
Phillip J. DeRosierDickinson Wright PLLC, Respondent
City of Monroe, Monroe Police Department, Police Chief Charles McCormick, Sergeant Chris Miller, Sergeant Derek Lindsay, Corporal Donald Brady, Detective Brent Cathey, Officer Shawn Koch, Officer Aaron Oetjens, Officer Mike Merkle
Christian Charles HuffmanGaran Lucow Miller, P.C., Respondent
Christian Charles HuffmanGaran Lucow Miller, P.C., Respondent
Janet Berry
Janet Berry — Petitioner
Janet Berry — Petitioner
Monroe County Respondents
Marcelyn A. StepanskiRosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuechler, P.C., Respondent
Marcelyn A. StepanskiRosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuechler, P.C., Respondent
Ray Kisonas
Michael L. ResisSmithAmundsen LLC, Respondent
Michael L. ResisSmithAmundsen LLC, Respondent
State of Michigan; Bill Schuette; Dana Nessel; MI Bureau of Licensing and Regulations, et al.
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent