Whether a state violates the express terms of a settlement agreement by refusing to affirm the decision maker of their authority to grant approvals that cannot be unreasonably withheld

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; . | . I. Whether A state violates The Express Terms of A Settlement Ag/eament By re Ming Te Dafrm The Pecislin Maker of Ther Astherth, Ts Grant | , Approvels That Cannot Be Unveasonably withheld ; a. Whether A stote Violates The Materlal Terms of A Settle nent Agreement | ge. Falling To Dnferwn A Pecislan Maker of The standard Te Be Aypplted ey | Con sidering To Grant Approvals That Cannot Bo Unreasenably withheld. 1 3. Whether Astute Vislates The Tm plled Covenant of bod Fatt Aud Fair Dooling By Ac bitractly Ana Tretlonrally withhalding Appreals That Lannot Be Unveasonably Withheld In Dauplementetion of A Settlement Ay reencent uilthevt Reason. 4. Whether A State That Breaches Materlal Terms Of A Setlement Agree meit May SHU Rely On The Release And Walver Cla of The Ayreement, 73 Benefit Third Party State Employer : Se Whether The Govrt Was Clearly Evroneoos In ots Findings of Facts } As Te The Evaluations And Te stl nconles of Valet And Roi. | | | ; x