No. 21-6409

Stephen Harmer v. Eric Armel, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney automatic-reversal conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure defendant due-process holloway-doctrine ineffective-assistance judicial-inquiry sixth-amendment trial-judge
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Holloway demand automatic reversal when a trial judge fails to inquire into a known conflict that a defendant could not object to because his attorney had hidden the conflict from him?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question(s) Presented | 1. Does Holloway demand automatic reversal when a trial judge fails to inquire into a known conflict that a defendant could not object to because his attorney had hidden the conflict from hime

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Eric Armel, et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Eric Armel, et al.
Andrew James GonzalezOffice of the District Attorney of Lancaster County, Respondent
Andrew James GonzalezOffice of the District Attorney of Lancaster County, Respondent
Stephen Harmer
Stephen Harmer — Petitioner
Stephen Harmer — Petitioner