Whether the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals misconstrued the federal statute when it failed to recognize the one-year limitations period begins to run when the U.S. Supreme Court decided the timely filed direct review writ of certiorari petition

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | D Did He US 57 Cirevit Cove tot Arpealr misconstrve the. (28056. 224¥YA)UA) _ __ federal statote when jn tbircare jt failed to recognize the one-year limitations peciod beginr te rea when the LS. Supreme Court decided the time ly properly. | —_ bled direct review writedcertiorars petition © Should the 5? Cireuit Court _ have sssvedacerttiak ot appealability teresclve the US. bishict Cooti _. ot the. 2254 petition ar dime barred 2 . 2) Did He US.5? Corevit Court miscanstrve Me 28 USC 22419C)M) and. _ 224V)V@E) federal stabcde when it tailed fe recogn (26 ira Lhiycase_a.frme by. _prose_motion for rehear/a 19. Liled with, phe iadermediate state appelfate court , _Stopsthe_appeal and. wh le pending” prevents _the2244@) enexyear _Limidatintpeciod trom starting fe run? Ay, ja thixcase, since the tyme by motivator rehearing is. docheted and endecided (pending) toc purpesesof _ | 22490) rhhte har the one-year timitatenon +» 2254 pettien reset. | . actually began teron 2 fs 9) lid He U.S. 57" Crrevit Lo ort Clecki tailurete_prereat the lettouncer | . timely and proper by supported petitrons te the Court judger tec review and —_— | . decision deny the lettioner cue _procers_of law vader the LY Amendment _ _ 4 the Onited Statler Conrhtotroa 2 Did the _louct Clechi_actwns reader . the result ot the appeal proceeding untateand unreliable? WL a timek preserted inetlechve_assis tance at co vate! complaint that _. _chearcly violates ones 67 Aynendmeat guaraatee to etlective counse! . —madiontuitial state habeas cocpot adjudicated an tht_smécite tot purport of 2200) where the hate couct re cord demon thrater 20 was compledeje — / ignored by the state court peviturprocers_© Lan a reasonable appleatin otf the Stricland test be applied arsreguined by federal laws where ax ia _ _Shix_care_the record tindngs of fact, , concloxions_ot law or consideration of groun ad ty condeeked a nd no State. flee edural bat_x_teleuantar well Po _Can the state tea reasonably ure the affinmatwe detease Phat fhe _tnetlec tie a srivtance of counre! Ccomplamt 2x fame baste aS under ZB VIC 22¥ ¥@) FO | i | i