No. 21-6411
Harley David Sharp v. Barry Goodrich, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence federal-review pro-se-litigation prosecutorial-misconduct standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a Brady Violation claim procedurally barred from Federal review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. ‘Is a Brady Violation claim procedurally barred from Federal review? 2. Does the Unconstitutional Failure of the Prosecution to disclose exculpatory evidence favorable to the Defendant to defense counsel and law enforcement violate substantive Due Process rights? 3. Is the Adams County District Attorneys Office above the Law? 4. Should an indigent pro se litigant be held to more stringent standards than . say, those appointed under the American Bar Association's code of professional conduct? | |
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Barry Goodrich, et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Barry Goodrich, et al.
Jillian Joy Price — Colorado Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Harley David Sharp
Harley David Sharp — Petitioner