Did the District Court of Arizona err in granting Summary Judgment for Defendants without presenting all the elements of Appellants' medical complaints?

No question identified. : _QUESTroN(s) PRESEWTED | | Did the Distr ct Cout OF Arizona err in granting Summary _Judgment fo DeRerdeants Without reneting all the elements OF F Appellants On anal Lomplaintz Le revial sfevrosrs, Carotrol Stenosis andl olelays tn ding ay Qrreche_preapment For Yhese Merheal needs. 2. Lid the Distict Coutof fylzona. evr inn re-openity Listovery for the DeFenndants fo whit additonal Cricterite avd 4 not gives Appellart the Opportunity @ rebut the adelitonad Cvidernte ? 3, bid the Dstiet-Cowt of Anzong evr in advisting the Lekendants_Of ther Jack Of Supporting Cvidente OF treatment. for Aepellants renal Steypsys avid Corota Stenosis _qnd Other Medical tetas 7 | 4. Da the DishretCov of freona treth not retesneing Ye Unacllrested Corond thd renal stewoss or that the | Contnuing Aéley Drrechie treatment-Cmsh vies GQ bMiolahon A Aypellentt Eight Amend munt-Aighfe 2 5 Did the Dstrict lot oF Arcana err granting Summary ___ Sucloment-to the Defendants, when the retord Showed andthe ___ Attached! atidavits Verified olelays, not-in justolay Or Weeks, bt Years 7 _b, Did cthe tral Court Judge OF the Wited States _Ostict Court abuse its discreton ley granting the _hespondents_n tus Cae Summary jucgnenty; When fects Was Unavailable to Petihoner in order _ 10 coat the Responolts motion for Summary Judgments ageunst him 2 — TST oF PARTreS TV All parties appear in the Cation oF the Case onthe lavrpage. __ LT MI parhes donot appear in the caption OF the case on _the Cover page. 4 list of all