Whether the United States Court for the Ninth Circuit departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the United States Court for the Ninth Circuit departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power over the lower courts' pattern of: * intentional failures to afford equal protection of laws and precedents to the unrepresented petitioners, an indigent mother and minor child, in their actions for redress on injuries they are suffering due to the private defendants' racketeering activities in violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c) and (d) to cause fraud upon the Superior Court of California for covering up sham, unlawful and invalid cross-marriages (which according to the Bureau of Immigration Appeals have “not been recognized as enabling the alien spouse to obtain immigration benefits”) with rubberstamped dissolution judgements, instead of proper nullification judgments, subsequently used in the defrauding of the United States for awarding naturalization unlawfully; and . ¢ blatant cheating of pro se shown in the Ninth Circuit's document titled “Information for Pro Se which misleads and deceives similarly situated pro se litigants in departure from Circuit Rule 30-1.2 and with mocking them by citing manufactured “Circuit Rule 30-1.1.1”. 2) Whether the Superior Court of California has decided judgements of dissolution giving “validation” to sham or non bona fide cross-marriages, obtained and maintained forcefully and unlawfully for the sole purpose of circumvention of | immigration laws, on the important question of federal law probing “[a] marriage | that is entered into for the primary purpose of circumventing the immigration laws, referred to as a fraudulent or sham marriage” for “not been recognized as enabling | an alien spouse to obtain immigration benefits” (BIA 1980), which has not been, but , should be, settled by this Court. |