Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state court unreasonably applies Atkins v. Virginia when it focuses on the individual's 'present functioning' in a prison environment, discounting historical evidence and diagnoses of intellectual disability
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L Whether it constitutes an unreasonable determination of the facts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2) when a state court decision rejecting an Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) claim of intellectual disability does so by focusing on the individual’s “present functioning” in the confines of a prison environment, effectively discounting overwhelming historical record evidence and multiple diagnoses of intellectual disability. IL. Whether a state court unreasonably applies Atkins when, contrary to the clinical standards in existence at the time adopted as controlling under state law for resolving claims of intellectual disability brought by death sentenced inmates, it treats the primary inquiry as the individual’s “present functioning” in a prison environment? Ill. Whether it is a miscarriage of justice and a constitutional violation to allow the death sentence to stand when the Warden and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals agree Mr. Hill is intellectually disabled? ii List of All
Docket Entries
2022-07-11
Record returned to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (2 boxes).
2022-06-30
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-6428_9p6b.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-19
Record received from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (2 boxes).
2022-01-18
Record received from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The record is electronic.
2022-01-06
Record Requested.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-21
Brief amici curiae of National Disability Rights Network, et al. filed.
2021-12-21
Reply of petitioner Danny Hill filed.
2021-12-14
Brief of respondent Tim Shoop, Warden in opposition filed.
2021-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)
Attorneys
The National Disability Rights Network, Disability Rights Ohio, Disability Rights Michigan, Disability Rights Tennessee, Kentucky Protection and Advocacy, The Arc of Ohio