No. 21-6430

Michael Cardora Roberson v. Joe Morgan, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights civil-rights-violation cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process section-1983 serious-medical-needs under-color-of-state-law
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendants' deliberate indifference to the plaintiff's serious medical needs violated the plaintiff's rights and constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Section 1983 Lacwusuits “Every person who. under Coler of any Statue. ordinance, regulation, custom or usageofany Stabe or Tectitory, or Me District of Columbia, Subjects, o¢ causes +o be SubjeCted, any citizen of the United States or other person within Phe jurisdiction thereoF to tne deprivation of . CaP egeset immunihies secuted fy the Constitution own laws, Shall be liable to +e. party injured in an action at law, surt in equity, of other proper proceeding for redress.,, a . a Onder Color of State lew The "Under color of state \aus" requirement cloes not mean Wak tne action has bo have been legal under Slate law. This is Very Important sand was decided Ina Case called Menrot vy. Pope » 365 U.S. 1GT A461). Defendants Tiffany Bowens Nurse, Soe Morgan Seniof Practice Manaaer, Angela Cooling Cluster~Nurse teraget deliberate indi Poremce to plaintiffs Serious medical needs : Violated plainti Ft rights: anc Constituted cruel and . Unusual punishment under the Gighth Amendment of the United Stetes Constitution. SIPOUIPIOANS IVY IO 514 asiandas pre V0 + hyayerbopo of payray vies fryt osro s4o0 yobayyt KIA} FVUOLPOT ASS Wp AZ OF Gvyuaburo op oF Pry po syne syed FO UAHA WHE JO PRUFGA, YU , VAIPOJOIA BU UI paodiaiyrod Arup SUnprOM “409 PPYSHIMSD Aya sm et. “UORT FATS UOT) SAS PHIM WH oF sUNWPIVWY UUbIQ FH | yapun punwysiund ymsnun puv pnd PHNYH SU0D Pe sMbIY HYYIOIZ PRCA TvAAIPUL BPAAqIPp FMeog "Y WAI ‘sjZUUMT -y PRAY Ylog (SHUOPLUaRG . Proyrry | | | ‘OHS Yep SOAS FAHY BH ab JUDWPLA UPYbIQ wy Jaypumn ‘puny und Porsnun perro ehetin) PHNIHS Ue”? a pv syubls vorngey soproy (roy JIHUPLY PrPIOIA Hynsmoun Lasnopy ~wopren Poa HHYIDIA scuroby . Ovipoy rey DIMAAA youshud MO We Guruaya sup . HOM 9 hyo WayNgYH Sowey Unog (sHUOpUAG aut ha voynyHsvley sane FeyUQ APH pvewpLawy yserg Wt RpUN 'yvnewysiund yponsnun pyre psd . | PrntHsuss pro squbla vesseqey woproy provi jyuyuroid Peyoaia«spouius Dub FO MSS ah ed HALYO|Z 479404 -O+4 = pr"94 FBNZFFO YO40! 499 5307) WINMA -Q rbpug jvrop weyad,

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael Cardora Roberson
Michael Cardora Roberson — Petitioner
Michael Cardora Roberson — Petitioner