No. 21-6441

Sonny Scott v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment attorney-performance constitutional-rights criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress search-and-seizure strickland-standard strickland-v-washington warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was counsel's refusal to file a meritorious, dispositive motion to suppress the fruits of a warrantless search unreasonable under Strickland v. Washington

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Was counsel’s refusal to file a meritorious, dispositive motion to suppress the fruits of a warrantless search unreasonable under Strickland v. Washington, particularly when her client truthfully notified her of facts establishing the unlawfulness of that search and counsel did nothing to investigate the issue? ii

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Sonny Scott
Celia RhoadsFederal Public Defender - EDLA, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent