No. 21-6443
Shaun Michael Bosse v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-conviction criminal-procedure final-judgment final-judgments habeas-corpus indian-law judicial-interpretation McGirt-precedent mcgirt-v-oklahoma procedural-law retroactivity
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 1408. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 1408. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced. i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-29
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2021-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Shaun Bosse
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner