May a next friend be declared vexatious without considering evidence of fraud on the court?

Questions Presented 1. May a next friend who is denied standing to petition for writ of habeas corpus be declared vexatious without considering evidence of fraud on the court? 2. How does a next friend establish standing for a habeas petition via the standards of “inaccessibility” or “mental incompetence”? 8. How does the party to a dismissed petition for writ of habeas corpus establish ; that her signature on the informal motion to dismiss was coerced, and that the sentiments of the letter are entirely false? 4. When a habeas petition details that the party has been stripped of their freedom of medical choice by the state court, may the district court dismiss the habeas petition filed on the party's behalf without evidentiary hearing, if the party to the habeas petition could be reasonably assumed to have possibly requested ‘assistance’ in asking for her habeas petition’s dismissal? 5. Does a motion to dismiss subsequently evidenced as submitted to the district court by staff employed by the respondent to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus qualify as “a scheme by which the integrity of the judicial process had been fraudulently subverted”? : 6. When the subsequent state court record evidences fraud on the United States Court, how does the adversely affected next friend obligate the district court to consider the state court’s record? : Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Certiorari before Judgement, pg. i 7. Does the Party to a habeas petition having a court-appointed guardian preclude a next friend from protesting the violation of Party’s rights? 8. When a citizen of the United States witnesses involuntary or coerced medicine that is delusional, cruel, ineffective or clearly harmful, but cannot object because of lack of standing, and would not be taken seriously in any case because he has no formal medical or legal credentials, how may an observant citizen object to the institutionalized medical violations of other citizens’ rights? ;