Should the courts employ a purely temporal approach or a 'totality of the circumstances' test when interpreting the Career Criminal Act's phrase, 'committed on occasions different from one another'?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Should the courts employ a purely temporal approach or a “totality of the circumstances” test when interpreting the Career Criminal Act’s phrase, “committed on occasions different from one another”? 2. In the event this Honorable Court finds the ACCA’s phrase, “committed on occasions different from one another” ambiguous, should the Court remand the defendant’s case for resentencing under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2)? ii