No. 21-6455
Anthony Pretty On Top v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amendment-violation appellate-review constitutional-rights district-court due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment legal-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in affirming the district court's decision that petitioner's Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DECISION THAT PETITIONER’S FIFTH, EIGHTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE NOT VIOLATED? i
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Anthony Pretty On Top
Evangelo Arvanetes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent