No. 21-6456

Terry Ray Carter v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process first-amendment overbreadth-doctrine pornographic-matter pornography supervised-release vagueness
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of 'any pornographic matter' violate due process as unconstitutionally vague?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate due process as unconstitutionally vague? I. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate the First Amendment? Ill. Isa-special condition of supervised release that prohibits going to “places where children may frequently congregate” overbroad and vague? i

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-03-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 30, 2022.
2022-02-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2022 to March 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2022.
2022-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 28, 2022 to February 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-29
Response Requested. (Due January 28, 2022)
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Terry Ray Carter
Brandon Elliott BeckFederal Public Defender's Office, Northern District of Texas, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent