No. 21-6456
Terry Ray Carter v. United States
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process first-amendment overbreadth-doctrine pornographic-matter pornography supervised-release vagueness
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy
FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of 'any pornographic matter' violate due process as unconstitutionally vague?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate due process as unconstitutionally vague? I. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate the First Amendment? Ill. Isa-special condition of supervised release that prohibits going to “places where children may frequently congregate” overbroad and vague? i
Docket Entries
2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-03-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 30, 2022.
2022-02-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2022 to March 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2022.
2022-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 28, 2022 to February 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-29
Response Requested. (Due January 28, 2022)
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Terry Ray Carter
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent