No. 21-6457

Ervin Anibar Lopez-Ordonez v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-procedure certiorari constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review precedent sentencing supreme-court supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183). No. In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2021 ERVIN ANIBAR LOPEZ-ORDONEZ, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Ervin Anibar Lopez-Ordonez asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on August 31, 2021.

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Ervin Anibar Lopez-Ordonez
Judy Fulmer MadewellFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent