Whether the district court's refusal to accurately compute the extent of a Speedy-Trial-Act violation and to consider the government's district-wide inattention to the Act or the possibility of non-trial prejudice to the defendant required a remand to evaluate whether dismissal-with-prejudice was appropriate

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court’s refusal to accurately compute the extent of a Speedy Trial Act violation and to consider the government’s district wide inattention to the Act or the possibility of non-trial prejudice to the defendant required a remand to evaluate whether dismissal with prejudice was appropriate in the context of an accurate and complete weighing of the statutory and non-statutory factors that have been identified by this Court. 2. Whether a delay of almost four years between the defendant’s arrest and trial violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. ii