No. 21-6462
Clarence Rozell Goode, Jr. v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-conviction criminal-procedure final-judgment habeas-corpus indian-law mcgirt-v-oklahoma oklahoma-law retroactive-application retroactivity supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 8. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was announced. i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-03
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2021-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Clarence Goode
Thomas David Hird — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent