No. 21-6463
William Martin Cresham v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure domestic-violence due-process evidence evidence-law prior-acts propensity propensity-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the admission of prior acts of domestic violence to establish the petitioner's propensity to commit such crimes violated his right to due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Topical Index
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2021)
Attorneys
California
Scott Alan Taryle — Department of Justice, Respondent
William Cresham
Alex Nicholas Coolman — The Law Office of Alex Coolman, Petitioner