No. 21-6467
John D. Glenn, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-fraud bank-fraud-statute circuit-court-split common-fraud definitional-term fraud-enforcement fraud-enforcement-and-recovery-act mortgage-lending-business statutory-interpretation third-circuit-ruling venture-capitalist-firms
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit's overbroad interpretation of what is a 'mortgage lending business' requires this Court's intervention
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Third Circuit’s overbroad interpretation of what is a “mortgage lending business,” a definitional term added by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 to be used to interpret, inter alia, the bank fraud statute, requires this Court’s intervention.
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
2021-10-14
Application (21A79) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 2, 2021.
2021-10-12
Application (21A79) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 2, 2021 to December 2, 2021, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
John D. Glenn, Jr.
Alison Brill — Office of the Federal Public Defender, D.N.J., Petitioner
Alison Brill — Office of the Federal Public Defender, D.N.J., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent