Did the state violate the federal due process rights of my petitioner by sanctioning the proper format accepted by the court to deny a sub-trial based on statute-based rules of court procedure and review of administrative decisions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . DR. MICHAEL KOGIANES , BORN 25 FESZUARY 1952, ScoRL TO AAEVE His Gott CuaTHD AY, WAS A we LONG TUNE RESIDENT OF biNoMiany , ARIZONA , JUS SOUTH OF LAS VEGAS, WAERE WE WAS A LURETU PRACTICING REA NSIBLE FoR DEUVERING OVER 7,006 BABYS DLING NE BtHoe THEY YIMS OF PRACTICE SPALNING THEEE GENE ZATIONS, AND IKMLEING THE LIVES OF ABON ONG TEIN RHE POPULATION EF bhS AEA. NS CrLy PCR REeCoeD IWiveRVES ARARC TICKES. 1S (992, AS A REQUIREMENT FOR IS CONTINUING Meo Cas COMPERENICY, HE HAD RO Are) A 3 Hort FECROAH IN TUCSON, WAVING His TWO YONG CAD REN A Soy PAD GAL, AGED 7 AND YEARS p RESRELVELY,. Wh PAE. Cage OF LS WuFe., WHO ANAS A AlueSe | HE FERED TO RAID THAT ING HS ASSEtnIcs. | WIS KIIFE RAD fae UP Wind A RATHER Nommious DeuG vealed. _ NS SROLK AND ANGER WAS ERACERSATED IN MEACAUALG OF TENS FPEAL LIC colons 9 FH OWD CAUSHTER , WHO Der 21 gery HER Monee’S ACHENS to HAL NE CONFROWED THe PAR FOR THe Reckies ACTIMMES, , AND Te Hae or WAL Came pete , DasereR, | THE DOUG DeALep in RESPONSE, LAUEHED, AND TOLD HIM to eer LES OR HE “WoL ces WM KE A BEER OAS" AnD tee He “Dip WS PAUGHIER, Too) ne Doc, Sot AND WuLLED HS PAUSHIER’S RAPES, AnD IN ATTAHPTUNG Po IwreaceDe | AS wie WAS STK AND OIE AS \OELE DECEMBER OF 1992, DR. KOSI MES WIS CHARGED, WITH A TERM OF 25 YEARS TO ELI\BILI by NO PAROLE. HOWeVed , exeecnve, LAND 1994, THE PATE OF ARIZONA REOUSHED PRKE, AND TS PAgHE BcReD SATA WS ReMeeD MAKE LP AND RUNES AnD REPUACED IT wth The BOARD OF EXMUTIVE Clemency WoMay, 2018, AS RiesT AMEN A cE. BEFORE TAT BOARD RESULTED IN A PENAL, PreroRreby CASED ONL ASTECS OF MKS CUM INAL CASE, ROMER THAL THE SpaItey GecustS cand in, ARS 83} 412(0). WAS NExt Review Ly 2019, A SIMMAL Resag CCCLR LED § Homey By TAS TIME, te HAD Famed we MEMS TO APPEAL A DEANAL OF ADMESION co PAROLE Bey Wy OF A retae in, WHE Sure cor PEFGH A DRY Ont THE ROMS Ser PERT IN ARS§ 31-1200), FOR WINCH HE FILED, AND WAS ACCEPED MITA AN ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE. IW It RECNIREMENUS FOR FURTHER ECCEEDINGS tay HE SENIOL UGE CE THE SUPERER Cor, HE PROMPNY COMED, THE sug RESPONGEAS , Honckiae, FRED A HORBA TO Tear HE pAeAL in ANOTHER Eonar, NOt EXAAC Ly Sr FoeAy UNCER Mie. NOM NOR, ET NEED AN LHe BSS INANCES IN DHEABS. OVERS CPRSINON, THE <P. PueVAED, TAS AKER ERT AGUSelt AL AAY Bore oF RUE Appear. REVIEM By A Juey UNDER THE AES Lal. As 1S MME THoeCUEHey SET Roe! HEREIN BELOW , THAR DECBION LAS BEEN PCESENIED Best. ; BACH MLACARE SAR FRLY INCLUDING te SUPREME CORT, AND SINCE ON CalanttniGe TO DRANEYL OR cD TUS OF COMFUSEMEMIT, THROUG:) to ie. NIA GARGUIF Co”RE OF ACREALS « THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS AUSE AS A RESLE OF Ne FomEGCUNL = . : 1) DID THE StATE VicLadE THE FepeRac. DUE PAOCESS RIES CE MY PenTIONER by SanTWé THe PROPER. FoRmar ACCEPTED By DE THAR COPE TO DENY A sup TRAE BARD ON SUWUTE~ EASED RULES OF Coupe 2 PtLevicr ad Review Of AdMAISTRATE DECISIONS , ARS $12910, ec s%y,] 2) DID TE coer Wot, TE FEDEOM Due rece AUD ES WAL pene! PENBIONS OF Andts . V any XIV IN acePrinig tae, DISPLACED Paik FORMAL, WHEE ONby THE SAE sUntENE COUT MAY PROMULGATE RULES FOR ma. INFERIO2 COWLES OF THe Sore 2 5) DID me Disner AIO cieminn COURS ER IN Nor GPANITING Rewiéywy Wren THe CARBS der To REMENE THE Bene Rin ain MEDICALLY VULMERABLE STARS OF THE PEIITIOVEs IN A COAMEX BESTEGPED . AS A FEDEDAL Paciliry FOR DOZENS OF ITS IMMATES WA FeDERDL/ SRE CON UAPENT teemS Z z