No. 21-6476

Aaron Michael Murray v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court-review civil-rights due-process frivolous in-forma-pauperis judicial-interpretation legal-precedent standing
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals violated this Court's decision in Ellis v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED _ Whether the district Coult ond the Eleventh | Citewit Court of Appeals violated this Coutts decision in Elli¢ v. United States, 356 U.S. | 674, 78 S.C 974, 2 LEM. 2d [060 (1758) by denying Petitioner leave to appeal in forma _ __ : pauperis and Classifying his appeal as frivolous, despite the foct that his arguments have merit, _ as Several other circuit Courts and the overwhelming | majority of disteict Courts agree with Petitionel’s arguments avd conclusions of lawh i ae —— |——--——a Ne a ed | | | i” , TABLE OF Comte NTS — | | QUESTION PRESENTED co ccs cevsencrsactnersvel , | Sen Mer rca i | TABLE OF APPENDICES J. 00 0c ct cece ee eee lV

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)

Attorneys

Aaron M. Murray
Aaron Michael Murray — Petitioner
Aaron Michael Murray — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent