No. 21-6481

General Grant Wilson v. Wisconsin

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2021-12-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice standing third-party-perpetrator wisconsin-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the limitations that Wisconsin places on a criminal defendant seeking to introduce evidence are consistent with the Due Process Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the limitations that Wisconsin places on a criminal defendant seeking to introduce evidence are consistent with the Due Process Clause. 2. Whether the standard applied by Wisconsin in assessing prejudice for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the context of a defense is constitutional. PARTIES AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW Pursuant to Rule 14.1(b), petitioner states as follows: qa) The

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-16
Reply of petitioner General Grant Wilson filed.
2022-02-07
Brief of respondent Wisconsin in opposition filed.
2022-01-10
Response Requested. (Due February 9, 2022)
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2021-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
2021-10-22
Application (21A96) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until November 29, 2021.
2021-10-19
Application (21A96) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 9, 2021 to December 19, 2021, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

General Grant Wilson
Joseph Dinneen KearneyAppellate Consulting Group, Petitioner
Joseph Dinneen KearneyAppellate Consulting Group, Petitioner
State of Wisconsin
John Arthur BlimlingWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
John Arthur BlimlingWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Wisconsin
Sonya BiceWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Sonya BiceWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent