Robert A. McNeil v. Department of State, et al.
DueProcess
Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2: In the context of a passport revocation, did Judge Bates err by denying opportunity to challenge via 26 U.S.C. §7345 whether a.) an “assessment” had been prepared by IRS, and whether b.) the alleged “certification” from IRS to State Department of a seriously delinquent tax debt was accurate? i