No. 21-6483

Robert A. McNeil v. Department of State, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-12-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process irs judicial-review passport-revocation standing tax tax-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS _ record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges? Question 2: In the context of a passport revocation, did Judge Bates err by denying opportunity to challenge via 26 U.S.C. §7345 whether a.) an “assessment” had been prepared by IRS, and whether b.) the alleged “certification” from IRS to State Department of a seriously delinquent tax debt was accurate? i

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent Dept. of State to respond filed.
2021-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)

Attorneys

Dept. of State
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Robert A. McNeil
Robert A. McNeil — Petitioner