Pradeep Gupte v. University of Connecticut
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated
No question identified. : > sires Offic] f4 ™ PRESENTED : rough ths he _Attorn G n Arntrie eS na Gore Cod Ale a Nong $3 . (Ble ELD ee rowley _didnct 2) ° a Please look at APE ( FOLA AAG NorG aroutller fal oe PAE Nfocaes | x ied under oath i was Hua dotnet which is vin Viglake ae SGC OS porS® 3) AAG Ther Diaz Ga om of 13 Us code FIST. eet POE an didnek sent wh) < , was Signet clurt cordractte the cow | to Impede justice 2004 g dried | of 4Q@ VS cel g “ig te violation | 2 § 15/7 +) pssooi ale fitorrey Ce fs I” vio lat on of neal Arden Howarel and 19 VS Coe 4g US Cok §& 15'7 = Sang Naney Browillel” is § 242, CYAAG Jnez Diaz CoNeze \ Folahon of 48 USC 242 43 USC § 2u2z ‘S$ in violahon of A) Title Vs age 410 . a, a jurisclictions! C at 3p eye i's nok US Supreme Couat), dr X v Davis;