No. 21-6507
Lyle Quinton Brown v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-rights due-process judicial-decision jurisdiction native-american official-authority precedent retroactivity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 non-retroactivity decision conflicts with the holdings in Sharp v. Murphy, 140 S. Ct. 2412 (2020) and McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lL. wWAehher or net Matloff y. Wallace, 2CVTIGK CR 2| noviretroactivity decision cenflicts wath the hed Ag 119 Sharp V. Murphy, ito $.4 24122 Qo2d and Megicet V Gkeheimad4d 3.Ct.24S2 (2026)? 2. Whether ornet Motloff y, Wallace, 2021 ok CR21 Aon reTroactwity decision conflicts with United States V. Dashney,92 F 3d. 296, 294 Cot Cir 1945) ? 3% Whether or nol Matlof£ y, Wallace 1262) OK CRZI noe — relveactivity decision conflicTs with United Gates . V. Tohnsord (62 S.Ct 2879Ci982)? . , . ~~
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Lyle Quinton Brown
Lyle Quinton Brown — Petitioner