No. 21-651
Edmond Lumaj v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-14
Reply of petitioner Edmond Lumaj filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-02
Brief of respondent Merrick B.Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
2021-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 2, 2022.
2021-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2022 to February 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 3, 2022.
2021-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to January 3, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)
2021-10-29
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in ths case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Edmond Lumaj
David Andrew Isaacson — Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, Petitioner
David Andrew Isaacson — Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, Petitioner
Garland, Merrick
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent