No. 21-6513
Christopher Schneider v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process federal-law first-amendment property-rights standing state-courts unlawful-detainer
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the California courts violated the Petitioners' fundamental due process rights by explicitly citing federal law and issues that directly involved the California courts enacting orders/opinions those courts made
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Questions ®Note ® Far Llerity gil auestions” tat follow paeated with »stractural Error’ fundamental Aue PrOLess” and Undonstitutionay 7 ell explicitly Gite Fedetay ull aie tity — issues that directly invalved fhe —@ilCalifornia lowes courts {nactimg Qvér Qrders/opinins those Coupes __ mad e (Se
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A., et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Tanya L Greene — McGuireWoods LLP, Respondent
Christopher Schneider
Christopher D. Schneider — Petitioner