No. 21-6517

Mark Stinson v. K. Cauley, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 8th-amendment administrative-segregation civil-rights constitutional-limits due-process fifth-amendment inmate-rights prison-administration
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2022-06-16 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison population and confine them to a less desirable regimen for administrative reasons

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison population and confine them to a less desirable regimen for administrative reasons. ' 2. Whether the mere possibility of petitioner's rational oO a a argument on the law or facts in support of his claim is ' warranted. 3. Whether their was a violation of the Fifth and Eighth ~o =~. Amendment Rights. Sn re — ; 7

Docket Entries

2022-08-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-06-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-02
Letter from the Solicitor General dated March 2, 2022 received.
2022-02-01
Response Requested. (Due March 3, 2022)
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2022)

Attorneys

K. Cauley, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Mark Stinson
Mark Stinson — Petitioner
Mark Stinson — Petitioner