No. 21-6521

Jamar Allen v. Mississippi

Lower Court: Mississippi
Docketed: 2021-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-provisions court-filing due-process hallucinogenic-drug judicial-process legal-document procedural-rules reasons-for-granting-writ scotus-petition victim-testimony
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause requires the burden of proof to be met if the only evidence justifying the petitioner as the shooter is the victim's testimony who did not testify to using a hallucinogenic drug prior to the shooting

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTION({S) PRESENTED “ES “We WMue, PROCESS CLAUSE — BURDENS BF PROOF MET IF THe ON SVIWOENCE WWESTIFVING THE, PELIONERD AS THE StloorER 15 Te VICTIMS TESTIMON Wo BOT TESTIFIED TO USING A HALLUCINOGENIC ORUG PRIOR: DH “We SHOOTING 2

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2021-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Jamar Allen
Jamar Allen — Petitioner
Mississippi
Ashley Lauren SulserOffice of the Mississippi Attorney General, Respondent