No. 21-6556
Richard Bernard Grundy, III v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california fifth-amendment judicial-discretion self-representation sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the District Court deprived Richard Grundy of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to represent himself
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the District Court deprived Richard Grundy of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to represent himself by improperly conditioning the exercise of his right to do so and improperly coercing him to proceed with court appointed counsel. ii
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Bernard Grundy
Kent R. Carlson — Kent R. Carlson & Associates PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent