No. 21-6557
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure guilty-plea non-jurisdictional-claim sixth-amendment waiver withdrawal
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err by ruling that Mr. Glover waived his Sixth Amendment claims by entering a guilty plea which he subsequently sought to withdraw, and in so doing continue the split of authority amongst the circuits?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERR BY RULING THAT MR. GLOVER WAIVED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS BY ENTERING A GUILTY PLEA WHICH HE SUBSEQUENTLY SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW, AND IN SO DOING CONTINUE THE SPLIT OF AUTHORITY AMONGST THE CIRCUITS? i
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Tekoa Glover
Jonathan McKey Milling — Milling Law Firm, Petitioner
Jonathan McKey Milling — Milling Law Firm, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent