No. 21-6566

Steven Craig Bethea v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-review criminal-sentencing discretion eighth-amendment judicial-abuse sentencing sentencing-discretion substantive-reasonableness upward-variance
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in sentencing the appellant to a greater sentence than necessary

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING THE APPELLANT STEVEN BETHEA TO A GREATER SENTENCE THAN NECESSARY AS THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY UPWARDLY VARIED THE SENTENCE BY IMPOSING A _ SUBSTANTIVELY UNREASONABLE SENTENCE THAT VIOLATED THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION. i

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)

Attorneys

Steven Craig Bethea
Jennifer Haynes RoseLaw Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Petitioner
Jennifer Haynes RoseLaw Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent