No. 21-6566
Steven Craig Bethea v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-review criminal-sentencing discretion eighth-amendment judicial-abuse sentencing sentencing-discretion substantive-reasonableness upward-variance
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in sentencing the appellant to a greater sentence than necessary
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING THE APPELLANT STEVEN BETHEA TO A GREATER SENTENCE THAN NECESSARY AS THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY UPWARDLY VARIED THE SENTENCE BY IMPOSING A _ SUBSTANTIVELY UNREASONABLE SENTENCE THAT VIOLATED THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION. i
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Steven Craig Bethea
Jennifer Haynes Rose — Law Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Petitioner
Jennifer Haynes Rose — Law Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent