No. 21-6587
Marcus Termaine Darden v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony gang-expert harmless-error hearsay hearsay-testimony sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Takings Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err by holding the district court's errors in admitting police 'gang expert' and other hearsay testimony were harmless?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I DID THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR BY HOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT'S ERRORS IN ADMITTING POLICE “GANG EXPERT” AND OTHER HEARSAY TESTIMONY WERE HARMLESS? o~ on . 1
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Marcus Darden
George Travis Hawkins — The Hawkins Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent