Whether the state court had jurisdiction over the federal claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Superior Court State of Arizona, Maricopa County, without authority, lacked jurisdiction of subject matter, and personal jurisdiction to hear an alleged case of fraud, theft, of Title 38 U.S.C.A. 5104, U.S.C.A. 5103(a) Veterans Disability, and Title 20—Employees Benefits, 5 U.S.C. 8101 et seq. Federal Employees Compensation Act. 2. Whether the State officers violated rights, and powers delegated to the United States by the U.S. Constitution under the Tenth Amend. (Federalism). 3. Whether the State of Arizona, Attorney General Officers acting under the color of state law, preempting Federal laws. (Supremacy Clause). 4. Whether the State Court judgment denied the petitioner federal protected right of Procedural Due Process of Law, and Equal Protections of the Laws, 14°" Amendment U. S. Constitution. (Title 38 C.F.R. 3.103). 5. Whether District Court refusal to accept the plaintiffs’ independent claim which raises denying his constitutional rights, stating it is barred by Rooker-Feldman Doctrine. 6. Whether the State laws in this case at bar are consider unconstitutional. 7. Whether a court can confer jurisdiction where none existed from the beginning and make a void court judgment valid. (Rule 60 (b)(4). 8. Whether the state court judge had not performed his judicial duties, was there a lack of authority or did state officers influenced decision in the case, and whether the state court impartial functions was directly corrupted,