Does the Fact that the Courts' Decision conflicts with Law mean that the Federal Courts have abused their discretion?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. “Does the Fact that the Courts’ Decision conflicts with Law mean that the Federal Courts have abused their discretion?” The Petitioner argues it clearly does as the Law makes it clear that some defendants in this case are “State Actors” although this has not been the finding of the court. 2. “Does the continual disenfranchisement of an individual, as irrefutably evidenced in that individual’s court documentation and associated appeals, violate that individual's Fifth Amendment Constitutional Rights, or any other Constitutional Rights?” The Federal District Court of Maine has been abusing, among other procedural mechanisms, 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) in order to procedurally dismiss the indigent and Pro Se Plaintiffs meritorious complaints against Government Employee defendants sua sponte (usually by misquoting the Plaintiff and then invoking Denton v. Hernandez) prior to service so that those guilty parties are never required to provide answer in response to the Plaintiffs verifiably accurate and well-evidenced complaints. These abuses have been continually upheld by The First Circuit. 3. “Does The Federal Courts’ continual and outright refusal to address Torture by U.S. Government Personnel, and their associated failure to assist the victim in any way whatsoever, infringe upon the victim’s Human Rights, Constitutional Rights, Civil Rights, or Rights conferred to the victim under United States and/or International Law?” The United States Government and Federal Court System has failed to conduct any investigation, or aid the Petitioner in any way, regarding his true, accurate, and verifiable claims that he has been Tortured by U.S. Government Personnel. This nonaction by the Government is in conflict with The Petitioner's basic Human Rights, his Constitutional and Civil Rights, and both Federal and International Law. The Petitioner notes that the Federal Courts have Jurisdiction over Torture (18 U.S.C. 118C) as it is a Federal Crime as well as an International Crime. 4. “Is the continuing harassment and intimidation of the Petitioner and his family by The United States Government and their friends (.e. “cronies”) lawful, moral, or praise-worthy”? The Petitioner finds it clear that it is not and respectfully asks The Honorable Court to put a stop to it before things get out of hand.