No. 21-6605
Jermaine Jackson v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: attempted-crime circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-criminal-procedure hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(A)'s definition of 'crime of violence' excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951(a)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(A)’s definition of “crime of violence” excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951(a). i
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Taylor</i>, 596 U. S. ___ (2022). .
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-14
Brief of respondent United States filed.
2022-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2022.
2022-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2022 to March 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-12
Response Requested. (Due February 11, 2022)
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2022)
Attorneys
Jermaine Jackson
Jesse Siegel — Law Office Of Jesse M. Siegel, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent