Akil Tymes v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
1) Does counsel perform deficiently in duties/responsibility, to fully
inform a defendant during the plea bargaining process, per Missouri v.
Frve. 132 S.C.T. 1394 (2012), in failing to communicate explicit advice or
re-advise his client to accept or, reject a plea, on conditions that may be
favorable or, dis favorable, to the accused; applying Strickland v.
Washington. 466 U.S. 688 (1984)?
2) Does the final judgment/decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals; "That a defense counsel has no obligation to advise or fully inform
a defendant to accept a favorable plea, create an exception .which is
contrary or unreasonable application, to the general rule announced in
Frve . that defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal offers from
the prosecution to accept a plea on terms and conditions that may be
favorable to the accused '? (Emphasis added)
Does counsel perform deficiently in failing to fully inform a defendant during the plea bargaining process?