Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

No question identified. : i l Whether Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures which seeds, in pert; “A party is allowed to Te = Complaint, (for infeectve Reiel] drawing inte question tie Constiiutionality of a federal or tete statute,” would apply to a federal statute, passed by Congress, that Courts of the State of Alaixania follow in lock-step? . im Whether the doctrine of vertical and horizontal “stare decisis” “shall” ‘eoperielly as it pertains to this Courts decisions on decided newest Ad if it shall be followed, was this doctrine properly followed in the petitioner(s) cases? And if it was mot, should this Court be alowed to ignere the hannfisl and injuious avers of the lamer ovis, rough 2 federal law passed by Congress? ; ili. Did the Lower Courts, in these matters improperly dismiss petitioner(s) . @onse" Compl and Pleadings on grounds of deck of Sieeling? NN. Did the Judicial Act of 1925 Unconstitutionally move this Honorable Court auvay from fis Cuigival Panpese, kotent and Reguamdigiity?