No. 21-6617

Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: american-heart-association civil-rights civil-rights-violation drug-eluted-stents due-process judicial-bias judicial-misconduct medical-malpractice procedural-error res-ipsa-loquitur
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Reverse and settle personal injury

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review US Sup Ct Rule 14.1(a) I. The Relief Sought Reverse and Settle Personal Injury [ 9" Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)()] Il. The issues (The Questions Presented for Review) [9 Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)(ii)] See below [1], [2], (3], [4], [5], [6] and [7]. [1] Appellant’s US Constitutional and Civil Rights Violation [CRV]; [2] Reverse Judgment issued on Feb.19, 2019 in favor of Timothy J. Daskivich, MD by TJ; [3] Reverse Judgment issued on Feb.14, 2019 in favor of CSMC by TJ in LASC; [4] Reverse Judgment [Demurrer] issued on Jan. 18, 2019 in favor of Nancy Zimmerman, NP and Jay Neal Schapira, MD by TJ in LASC: allowed to proceed in Federal Court; [5] Court Order for AWARD based on Documents presented, which is just and proper; , [6] Reassignment the Cases to Settlement Court [USCA-Mediation Dept.] if No Award is granted; [7] Reverse, remand, reassignment and Trial Judge Disqualification based on plain ERRORS, bias with gross prejudice, willful misconduct and adverse personal reaction with harassment. Ill. The Facts necessary to understand the issue presented by the Petition. [9 Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)(iv)] IV. The reasons why the writ should issue [ 9" Circuit FRAP 21(a)(2)(B)(iv)] [1] The lower Courts has decided the Cases based on an issue without OSC; Briefing of both parties and failed to established the truth; [2] The Opinion of US Court of Appeal 9" Cir and 2DCA of California--omits and misstates an issues of substantial material facts -Who Order Appellant [Alan Douglas] to stop Aspirin 81 mg and why Medical Staff Violated American Heart Association Guideline for procedure? [3] There are fundamental errors in the Opinion of the Court of Appeal which skewed the Analysis, Results and Findings which are basis for reasonable possibility of the cure by means Panel full Review and Reversal . .Nationwide, the Problem with 2DES [two Drug Eluted Stands] is not solved or exist Legal Regulation. The Appellant [Alan Douglas] is Victim of Medical Malpractice, because Medical Staff do not follow American Heart Association Guide Line for Procedure with Patient with implanted 2DES. Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in the Supreme Court of the United States Petition for Writ of Certiorari to USCA 9th Circuit 21-55886 USSC Case. Case: 21-55886, 12/11/2021, ID: 12313319, DktEntry: 20-1, Page 3 of 34 3 USSC No.: SS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ‘rreparable Heart INJURY cause Disability Res Ipsa Loquitur ALAN DOUGLAS, : USSC No.: Petitioner Appellant, SCA 9" Cir No.: 21-55886 vs. US District Court 0973-2 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, D.C. No.: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On Petition for a WRIT of Certiorari to USCA 9" Circuit No.: 21-55886 on CRV MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED JN FORMA PAUPERIS The petitioner asks leave to file the attached petition for a writ of certiorari without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis. Please check the appropriate boxes: : X@ Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the following court(s): LASC, 2DCA, Supreme Court of California, USCA 9® Circuit; X& Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration in support of this motion is attached hereto. ‘ Dated: Dec. 10, 2021 Signed » Ms ough Los Angeles, CA Alan Douglas, P:f/Se Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles In the Supreme Court of the United States Petition for Writ of Certiorari to USCA 9th Circuit 21-55886 USSC Case. Case: 21-55886, 12/11/2021, ID: 12313319, DktEntry: 20-1, Page 4 of 34 4 es The Los Angeles County Superior Court Superior Court Case No.: BC657529/BC696685 : List of Superior Court Judges on Both Cases 1. Hon. Benny C. Osorio — Dept.97, Room 630 ; 2. Hon. Dennis Landin — Dept.93 Superior Court . 3. Hon. Elaine Lu Dept. 5 PI [Personal Injury] Court 4. Hon. William F. Fahey — Dept. 69, Room 621 Superior Court, Independent Calendar, ‘ last Judge assigned for all purposes 5. Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch — Supervising Jud

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Alan Douglas
Alan Douglas — Petitioner