No. 21-6624

Arthur F. Jones v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights due-process federal-court-procedure federalism habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdiction-dispute standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration WageAndHour
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the axon exclusive soars decision rule should have precluded the district court and the appellate court from exercising jurisdiction over the same res to defeat or impair the state court's jurisdiction

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; a TL. WAETHER THE axon EXCLUSIVE SoarsDECTTON GuLE: SHovLO Have Pacctunen THE OxrsTArcT Covet Ano aHe ARPELLANT CovaT Enom ExEgczsEve Juersorctren ; ove TRE SAME Bes To DEFEAT OA KmPARR THE STATE CouT’s DuassoRcTron 4 Oe . xr, WhetTHen THE Ozer ance Covet LACK THe AvTHORTTY TO ESsue THE Want oF ; ; WABEAS Contus Ad PAcSeQuenoUM Because TT WAS THE FUNcTEONAL €Qr: . oO VALENT OF A Wageas Coats Ad FACZENDUM EX RECEPREWDLM WAR PAsseD . ; ~ OVER THe JunzsoacTEoN Lene OF Drunsrow SET WEEN THE STATE And " Fepenm, Sovenczantres 3 : , . pan, WWetten THe UszteED STATES Suememe Covkt 2S OsLzGateo TO EXAMINE THe . GureRcRENcY OF Sones’ SPEcal PLEA To THE JoRTsoBCTTow PuRgUANT TO Was Feperar RULE OF Crvcl PROCEDURE aLyIC) MoTIoN HE F2LEd IN THE —ARREALS CoutT ReGadORNG TTS Lack oF Sugsect MATTER Joarsorcrzon OW ; AWE GBAsrS THAT THE TAroK EACLuseve TRTSOTCTTonw BLE DISABLED THE * Coutts OF THE UNztED STATES EAom EPE RCTSTNG THEre SuessvzcTLow . ; " OVER Uxm AND Tas Cause oF Actzon UNDER Hevres 4 7 : xv. Whetea we ARREALS Counr’s PRE MATURE AdSUDECATRON OF Sones’ " Clamms Wave Rewoe ken THE ARE ALS Cover SvdG@mEnT voto FoR Lack OF SusTECT MATTER JUORESORCTION Because owes WAS Dewaen THE OrawT . © TO GE WEARD AND AN OFPoRTOWS TY TO ANSWER To “THE Governmenr’s , RELY Barer 1: : : Questzon ($) Presenteo Cont, Ve. Whe the ® TRE Potent zal FoR WHET OF CeaTZOMART Dewsal AVD THe UNWattanoness OF THE ARZEALS CoUAT TO AFFORD Sowss A Remedy AGATNST TUE PSSTARCT COV|T'S TVVALTO AWO FOKEZGN PAOLESS OF RLLEGALLY SETLxvG Wem AND THrs CAUSE OF ACTRON Faom THE Come TENT SuarsoecTTon . OF The STATE CourT Spovio Paovaoe Jowes A REMEDY Ew THE StAtE Covtt TO Ge DEvEsTED Faom TRE SEOGMENT OF THE DesrAzcr CovmT THAT Wad NO fowsa TO EwTER THE TUdGMENT 7 a 7 LISTOFPARTIES © [x] All parties appear in the caption of the casé on the cover page. re | ].All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of OS . all

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Arthur Jones
Arthur F. Jones Jr. — Petitioner
Arthur F. Jones Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent