Whether the petitioner has a valid property interest in the land that was the subject of the federal land patent filed with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds

No question identified. : Petitioner JozetteFiled a Federal Land patent with the cook county recorder deeds 118 N. Clark : ste#120 Chicago,il 60602. : (Appendices D) line #9 of the Title search, petitioner Jozette had to take the original title owner Jeremiah Price from the 1800’s,and run a article in the paper filing it with the cook county. ; bulletin desk locate in room# 802 in the daley courthouse chicago,il 60651.(Appendices D) . line#9 of the title search. Petitioner Jozette separated both lots each having its own new ‘pini#1 6-05-428-0(still vacant land)petitioner Jozette is paying taxes as of 2024 on it) paid all her taxes on vacant lots, ~ , and conveyed her sister petitioner Balitha Stella Greenfield on assignment while title was in : trust on June 29th,2004 (Appendices B). : the petitioner Jozette Pepper Greenfield, built a house on one of the lots and satisfaction of . The mortgage was filed in Cook county on March 18,2003 by mortgage company Long beach. . Jozette kept the trust#7623 bifurcated from the dwelling,allowing conveyance to Balitha (petitioner) on June 29th 2004 (Appendices B).This case is simple,Balitha didn’t convey title at all to anyone. She is the owner of the Land known as 821 N.Menard. Balitha has 20yrs to come back and request the courts to reverse the unlawful judgement entered on 29th of June . 2009. a lien should have been placed not a on the dwelling,not a : ; judgement for possession in a foreclosure.this case should be granted a writs of certiorari, : based on judicial discretion. ( This is not res judicata) | . (Appendices A), when petitioner Balitha Stella became owner of trus#7623 on June 29th, 2004 . (Appendices B). No debt was owed. : The Title clearly shows Balitha Stella Greenfield is the correct owner of Both Land Lots, never conveying her title to anyone else. . : ; Chicago Title was the first person brought into court,and Chicago Title apologized to the : : Petitioners Jozette and balitha Greenfield for this mistake.Chicago title took immediate Vanessa Munoz is reliable for what happens with this case) : Officers from chicago title told respondent Vanessa Munoz to complete her Title insurance claim with them and return the property at once, respondent Vanessa Munoz refuses to comply. CONCLUSION The lower courts are erroneous, the appellate court first district did not review this case instead they cut and paste order from circuit court. — . the title shows the Land was placed in trust and the assignment has petitioner Balitha Estella Greenfield as the sole beneficiary, until the bank cosmopolitan dissolved in 2006,then Petitioner became Owner of the title to Land, no mortgage was owed at the time of transfer of title. (petitioner Balitna was not part of the mortgage). In the lower courts under Quiet title case, the judge didn’t allow this case to be proven : Petitioners asked and pleaded for an extension of time to get the copy of the title Search, covid 19 closed and slowed down all government offices,which is now attached to this writ of certiorari, the motion to amend the complaint was denied. . (All litigation filed by petitioner Jozette was a lack of knowing how to prove that a : foreclosure was the wrong legal process, petition has now proven this to this court. . petitioner was pro se and still is, petitioner has finally proven this case. : This case was ruled without prejudice which allows a higher court to an review. Theresondants counsel has insulted the petitioners, by calling them serial litigation filers. Then claim petitioner jozette lost interest in the property, well petitioner jozette never lost interest at all. ; Petitioner was granted: possession back from the first foreclosure in 2003. : ; The lower courts ruled in petitioners favor,dismissing the foreclosure in 2003 with prejudice. ; . ; The lower courts allowed a 2nd foreclosure to be filed in 2007 and.allowed this case to , move forward without looking into the case. ' Foreclosure was not the proper lega