Did the Petitioner state enough facts (included in his attachments as well as the text) to present a valid claim?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED i Did the Petitioner state enough facts (included in his attachments as well as the text) to present a valid claim? In Did the Petitioner state enough facts (included in th his» attachments as well as the text) to present a claim of due process violations? SIL Did the Petitioner show “injury in fact"? : tv. Did the Petitioner state enough facts (included in his attachments as well as the text) to present a claim of equal ~ protection violations? uw Is TDCJ-RPD limmiting the Petitioner's lst Ammendment Right to Freedom of Speach by preventing him the equal opportunity to reform by denying him the knowledge needed to re-entergrate upon his release? VL Is the fact that the Petitioner is being denied the right to be treated the same as other similarly situated prisoners (S3-G2 Class) denying him the equal opportunity at re-entergration into ; society upon his release going to cause harm that reaches beyond the scope of his period of incarceration to be considered a fact ii why Me aL in violation of Packingham_vNorth Carolina, 137 S.ct 1730 (2017)? VIL By denying sex offenders the opportunity to learn how to use ‘ the computer to learn skills such as Computer Aided Drafting and Office Applications in order to obtain jobs as Administrative Assistants, is not TDCJ-RPD as well as TDCJ-ID in general, z attempting to prevent sex offenders from having the same chance at survival as other similarly situated offenders and an equal opportunity at re-entegrating into society? IIT Has the petitioner herein shown "injury in fact" because he is being denied the equal opportunity to survive in society upon his release?