No. 21-6652
Salatheo Fluid v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion attorney-representation criminal-procedure district-court federal-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-standing motion-for-new-trial
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts abused their discretion in dismissing petitioner's motion for a new trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . : WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ABUSED THEIR RESPECTIVE DISCRETION BY DISMISSING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (Fed.R-.Crim.P. 33(b)), BASED ON A MOTION TO DISMISS THE SAME FILED BY AN ATTORNEY WHO WAS NOT REPRESENTING ; THE BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT ON THE : : MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL? 4 . . .
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent