No. 21-6659
Glen Seals v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky habeas-corpus johnson-v-california judicial-review mixed-question-of-fact-and-law peremptory-strike prima-facie prima-facie-case race-discrimination standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-courts-may-consider-potential-race-neutral-reasons-at-batson-prima-facie-stage
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, under Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), a court may supply and consider potential race-neutral reasons for a prosecutor’s peremptory strike at the prima facie stage of the Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) framework? 2. Whether the denial of a prima facie case under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), is a mixed question of fact and law or a purely factual one, and, if purely factual, whether a federal habeas court reviews that determination under § 2254(d) or § 2254(e)? i | |
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy
Glen Seals
Cecelia Trenticosta — Petitioner