No. 21-6659

Glen Seals v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky habeas-corpus johnson-v-california judicial-review mixed-question-of-fact-and-law peremptory-strike prima-facie prima-facie-case race-discrimination standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-courts-may-consider-potential-race-neutral-reasons-at-batson-prima-facie-stage

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, under Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), a court may supply and consider potential race-neutral reasons for a prosecutor’s peremptory strike at the prima facie stage of the Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) framework? 2. Whether the denial of a prima facie case under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), is a mixed question of fact and law or a purely factual one, and, if purely factual, whether a federal habeas court reviews that determination under § 2254(d) or § 2254(e)? i | |

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Darrel Vannoy
Darren Anthony AllemandJefferson Parish District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Glen Seals
Cecelia Trenticosta — Petitioner