No. 21-6663
Asher Abid Khan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-deference remand sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals fail to accord due deference to the district court's reasons for reimposing the same sentence after remand?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Did the Court of Appeals fail to accord due deference to the district court’s reasons for reimposing the same sentence after remand? i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Asher Khan
Thomas S. Berg — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent