No. 21-6674
Paul David Storey v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: due-process first-federal-habeas habeas-corpus panetti prosecutorial-concealment prosecutorial-misconduct second-federal-habeas
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 28 U.S.C. §2244 bar claims of prosecutorial-misconduct,habeas-corpus,due-process,prosecutorial-concealment,first-federal-habeas,second-federal-habeas,panetti
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does 28 U.S.C. §2244 bar claims of prosecutorial misconduct that were deliberately and successfully concealed by the prosecution until after the petitioner’s first federal habeas petition was resolved? ii
Docket Entries
2022-06-30
Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-6674_6468.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-11
Reply of petitioner Paul Storey filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-28
Brief of respondent Bobby Lumpkin in opposition filed.
2022-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2022.
2022-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 20, 2022 to February 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)
Attorneys
Bobby Lumpkin
Travis Golden Bragg — Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Paul Storey
Michael Logan Ware — Michael Logan Ware Attorney at Law, Petitioner